I guess I am having a hard time wrapping my mine around the logic I see being used concerning this particular issue. I think it's mainly because where I live, the industry has no law enforcement component that I have ever seen or heard, and the law here allows the facility to take possession of the leined property and dispose of it however they wish, so ALL of it could be auctioned, SOME of it could be auctioned, or NONE of it could be auctioned.
I think if I understand the logic, it's the assumption of hidden value in a unit based on the fact that the property was seized by a lein and will be auctioned off in whole, therefor any other type or condition of auction is fraudulent, mainly because of the decreased potential of hidden value/property?
In my mind, there is no difference between bidding on a unit with leined property in it that includes a couch, loveseat, and 10 boxes of unknown stuff; and bidding on a unit that the facility owner let his mother-in-law put in a couch, loveseat, and 10 boxes of unknown stuff.
The risk is the same. you have a general idea of what the couch and loveseat is worth in the resale market and if you bid beyond what is profitable on those two peices of furniture to get to the unknown boxes then that decision is on you.
I agree with one of the posters that in the long run it's not a good idea to have a reputation as a trouble maker for the other facilities that hold auctions. I would just avoid that facility all together until I heard from others that the managment has changed or it appears everything is on the up and up.