Have cut off the voting, but the four people who did vote felt the party-girl did it.
OJ had nothing on this girl (IMHO). Amazing to me that she was acquited. I heard one analyst say that jurors believe all the crap on TV shows such as DNA coming back in an hour, etc. They want a smoking gun.
The analyst went on to say that while circumstanial evidence isn't as damning as more solid evidence (like fingerprints on the duct tape, etc) that the PREPONDERENCE and QUANTITY of circumstantial evidence should have been enough to find her guilty.
This girl will get hers in the end as she will be shunned by more people than will accept her, and who would want anything to do with her anyway. I give her a year or less before her troubles again make headlines.
Will be interesting to see what the jurors have to say for themselves.